| TRADITIONAL
Apparel Plant Due to High Work In
Progress, managers are unable to manage the
production well. Cut pieces from cutting
room,sewing section and to finishing sections
will take approx. 3-7 days. E.g. manufacturing a
man's polo shirt,
the S.A.M. is
13.5mins, but in the bundle system, every
operator has 3-4 bundles of 25-30 pcs. thus every
operator will have min. of 100pcs WIP.
Through Put
Time for complete sewing is 3 days.
Example
100pcs(WIP) x
13.5mins(SAM)=1,350 mins required
1,350 mins /
480 mins (8 hours per day) =2.8125 days
|
|
SMART-MRT System
Plant The most striking advantage of the SMRT
System is the drastic improvement in Throughput
Times. In the SMRT System Plant, Total
cycle time was reduced from 3 days to less than a
day. Fast throughput times is due to a reduction
in Work In Process.
For instance,
the SMART System producing the same polo
shirt, SAM is still 13.5mins but the Throughput
Time is about 5 hours only!
Example
20pcs(WIP) x
13.5mins(SAM)=270 mins
270 mins / 480
mins(8 hours)
=0.563 day OR
=4.5 hours only!
|
| |
|
|
| Progressive
Bundle System This traditional method
of manufacturing has been widely adopted in the
Apparel Industry for the past 3 decades.
Parts of
various component after being cut in the Cutting
Room are tied up in bundles and distributed out
to the Sewing Section. This is called the
Progressive Bunle System (PBS).
This method
requires bundle to be transported to individual
sewing operators. Sometimes, factory
porters/helpers are hired to do this transporting
work. But usually, the operators have to stop and
leave their workspace to look for the bundles.
This is an
INEFFECTIVE practice, as production managers are
unable to manage or plan the production
effectively.
|
|
Factory
Automation with UPS Factory Automation by
the usage of UPS is NEW leapt into Garment
Productionin the garment arena.
This practice
taps on the capability of Technology by the
mechanical transportation of cloth pieces to
operators by the automated system.
This results in
an Easier pick-up and Disposal at each
workstation.
Further, the
system addresses the problem of Wasted Time spent
when the garment is idle between workstations.
Most crucially,
UPS systems address the weakness of:
-Long Delivery Times
-Long Response Times
|
| |
|
|
| Intensive
Direct Labour Contents Statistics show that
operators in most Progressive Bundles Systems
(PBS) factory often spend a considerable time on
tying and untying bundles, pulling the bundle
tickets, handling works and associated clerical
works.
|
|
Reduction is
Direct Labour Contents The UPS presents the
garment directly to the operator for easy pick-up
and then automatically removes the garment upon
completion. This reduces the Direct Labor Content
by eliminating bundle handling costs and the
associated clerical duties.
|
| |
|
|
| High Work In
Process The PBS philosophy adopts the "High
Work In Process", or "Keep The Girl
Busy" task management.
E.g. If an
operator can sew 200 dozens works per day,
regardless of the production of other operators (
120-150 dozens daily ). So everyday that
particular sewing girl produces an extra 50-70
dozens work pieces left over, because others
could not cope with her capacity. After 5 days,
the extra builds up to 250-350 dozens, so WIP was
increasing daily. Alas, the manager has to get
additional manpower to work on the slacks.
|
|
Great Reduction
in Work In Process UPS systems cause a
reduction in Work In Process levels and change in
the management Philosophy of an apparel plant
from "High Work in Process" levels to
"Low Work in Process" levels, which
allow quick response.
In a UPS plant,
every workstation will hold a max. of 25 garments
per station. So a great reduction in Work In
Process as compared to the Bundle System Plant
where each operator has 100 pieces (WIP). All
finished garments are transported automatically
between workstations.
|
| |
|
|
| More cutting
works required As a result of High Work
In Process required by sewing section, cutting
sections are required to perform 60-70% more than
actual production can handle.
|
|
Reduction in
cutting works Lower WIP results in
less cutting works. Coordination between cutting
section and sewing section will improve.
|
| |
|
|
| High Inventory Due to more cutting jobs
being required, manufacturer needs to stock more
fabrics and other accessories in advance of the
actual planned production to fulfill the needs of
the High WIP.
|
|
High Inventory
avoided As a direct result of lower WIP,
manufacturer will not be required to stock larger
amount of fabric.
|
| |
|
|
| Long Delivery and
Slow Through Put Time Due to the High Work In
Progress, managers are unable to manage the
production well.
Cut pieces from
cutting room, sewing section and to finishing
sections will take approx. 3-7 days or more.
E.g. if
manufacturing a man's shirt, the S.A.M. is
13.5mins, but due to the bundle system, each
operator has min. of 3-4 bundles and every bundle
has 25-30 pcs . thus every operator will have
min. of 100 pcs WIP.
The Through Put
Times for complete sewing is 3 days.
Calculation:
100pcs(WIP) x 13.5mins(SAM)=1,350 mins
1,350 mins /
480 mins (8 hrs per day)=2.8125 days
|
|
Fast Through Put
Times Probably the most striking advantage of
the UPS System is the drastic improvement in
Through Put Times. Within the UPS Plant, the
total cycle time was reduced from 3 days to less
than 1 day! Fast through put times due to a
reduction in WIP.
E.g. a UPS
system producing the same man's shirt, SAM is
still 13.5mins but the Through Put Times is about
5 hours only.
Calculation:
20pcs(WIP) x 13.5mins(SAM)=270 mins
270 mins / 480
mins (8 hours)=0.563 day OR
=4.5 hours
only!
|
| |
|
|
| Direct Labor
Excesses Progressive Bundle System often needs
more overtime works, operators make-up and to do
repair works due to some unfinished operations.
The average Direct Labor Excesses is 13.3% which
is definitely higher than UPS System.
|
|
Reduction in
Direct Labor Excesses Direct Labor Excesses
were greatly reduced. Average excesses in plants
using PBS were 13.3% of Direct Labor, while the
average excesses in plants using the UPS were
much lower. Consequently, UPS systems experienced
less overtime, operator make-up and total repair
costs versus those costs attributed to the PBS
system.
|
| |
|
|