EXTREME PROGRAMMING FROM A CMM PERSPECTIVE
Mark C. Paulk, Software Engineering Institute

RELATED ARTICLES

AUTHOR	YEAR	ARTICLE	DESCRIPTION	HOW IT RELATES TO MAIN ARTICLE
M.C. Paulk	1995	The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Addison- Wesley, Reading, Mass	Improving the CMM model	Further details about about CMM
M.C. Paulk	June 1999	“Using the Software CMM with Good Judgment,” ASQ Software Quality Professional, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 19–29	Selective usage of CMM	Further details about CMM
D.L. Johnson and J.G. Brodman	July/Aug. 2000	“Applying CMM Project Planning Practices to Diverse Environments,” IEEE Software, vol. 17, no. 4, , pp. 40–47	Application of CMM	Further details about CMM in the real world
K. Beck	1999	Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass	All about the concept of XP	Further details on the concept of XP
IEEE Computer Soc. Dynabook, J. Siddiqi	Nov. 2000	“eXtreme Programming Pros and Cons: What Questions Remain?”	The pros and cons of using XP	Further details on implementing XP
L. Williams	July/Aug 2000	“Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming,” IEEE Software, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 19–25	Emphasis on Pair Programming in XP	Further details on the pro of using XP
A. MacCormack	2001	“Product-Development Practices that Work: How Internet Companies Build Software,” MIT Sloan Management Rev., no. 42, vol. 2, pp. 75–84	Software development practices	Further details on the use of XP and CMM in modern software projects