| The Questions of
King Milinda Special thanks to Brother Henry Chia |
THE CHARIOT
And King Milinda asked him:
"How is Your Reverence
known, and what is your name,
sir?"
"As Nagasena I am known, O
Great King, and as Nagasena do my
fellow religious habitually
address me. But although parents
give name such as Nagasena, or
Surasena, or Virasena, or
Sihasena, nevertheless, this word
"Nagasena" is just a
denomination, a designation, a
conceptual term, a current
appellation, a mere name. For no
real person can here be
apprehended."
But King Milinda explained:
"Now listen, you 500 Greeks
and 80,000 monks, this Nagasena
tells me that he is not a real
person! How can I be expected to
agree with that!" And to
Nagasena he said: "If, Most
Reverend Nagasena, no person can
be apprehended in reality, who
then, I ask you, gives you what
you require by way of robes,
food, lodging, and medicines? Who
is it that guards morality,
practises meditation, and
realizes the [Four] Paths and
their Fruits, and thereafter
Nirvana? Who is it that killing
living beings, takes what is not
given, commits sexual misconduct,
tell lies, drinks intoxicants?
Who is it that commits the Five
Deadly Sins? For, if there were
no person, there could ne no
merit and no demerit; no doer of
meritorious or demeritorious
deeds, and no agent behind them;
no fruit of good and evil deeds,
and no reward or punishment for
them. If someone should kill you,
O Venerable Nagasena, would not
be a real teacher, or instructor,
or ordained monk! You just told
me that your fellow religious
habitually address you as
"Nagasena". Then, what
is this "Nagasena"? Are
perhaps the hairs of the head
"Nagasena?"
"No, Great King!"
"Or perhaps the nails,
teeth, skin, muscles, sinews,
bones, marrow, kidneys, heart,
liver, serous membranes, spleen,
lungs, intestines, mesentery,
stomach, excrement, the bile,
phlegm, pus, blood, grease, fat,
tears, sweat, spittle, snot,
fluid of the joints, urine, or
the brain in the skull-are they
this "Nagasena"?"
"No, Great King!"
"Or is "Nagasena"
a form, or feelings, or
perceptions, or impulses, or
consciousness?"
"No, Great King!"
Then is it the combination of
form, feelings, perceptions,
impulses, and
consciousness?"
"No, Great King!"
"Then is it outside the
combination of form, feelings,
perceptions, impulses, and
consciousness?"
"No, Great King!"
"Then, ask as I may, I can
discover no Nagasena at all. This
"Nagasena" is just a
mere sound, but who is the real
Nagasena? Your Reverence has told
a lie, has spoken a falsehood!
There is really no
Nagasena!"
Thereupon, the Venerable Nagasena
said to King Milinda: "As a
king you have been brought up in
great refinement and you avoid
roughness of any kind. If you
would walk at midday on this hot,
burning, and sandy ground, then
your feet would have to trend on
the rough and gritty gravel and
pebbles, and they would hurt you,
your body would get tired, your
mind impaired, and your awareness
of your body would be associated
with pain. How then did you come
on foot, or on a mount?"
"I did not come, Sir, on
foot, but on a chariot."
"If you have come on a
chariot, then please explain to
me what a chariot is. Is the pole
the chariot?"
"No, Reverend Sir!"
"Is then the axle the
chariot?"
"No, Reverend Sir!"
"Is it then the wheels, or
the framework, of the flag-staff,
or the yoke, or the reins, or the
goad-stick?"
"No, Reverend Sir!"
"Then is it the combination
of poke, axle, wheels, framework,
flag-staff, yoke, reins, and goad
which is the
"chariot"?"
"No, Reverend Sir!"
"Then, is this
"chariot" outside the
combination of poke, axle,
wheels, framework, flag-staff,
yoke, reins and goad?"
"No, Reverend Sir!"
"Then, ask as I may, I can
discover no chariot at all. This
"chariot" is just a
mere sound. But what is the real
chariot? Your Majesty has told a
lie, has spoken a falsehood!
There is really no chariot! Your
Majesty is the greatest king in
the whole of India. Of whom then
are you afraid, that you do not
speak the truth?" And he
exclaimed: "Now listen, you
500 Greeks and 80,000 monks, this
King Milinda tells me that he has
come on a chariot. But when asked
to explain to me what a chariot
is, he cannot establish its
existence. How can one possibly
approve of that?"
The 500 Greeks thereupon
applauded the Venerable Nagasena
and said to King Milinda:
"Now let You Majesty get out
of that if you can!"
But King Milinda said to
Nagasena: "I have not,
Nagasena, spoken a falsehood. For
it is in dependence on the pole,
the axle, the wheels, the
framework, the flag-staff, etc,
there takes place this
denomination "chariot",
this designation, this conceptual
term, a current appellation and a
mere name."
"Your Majesty has spoken
well about the chariot. It is
just so with me. In dependence on
the thirty-two parts of the body
and the five Skandhas, there
takes place this denomination
"Nagasena", this
designation, this conceptual
term, a current appellation and a
mere name. In ultimate realtiy,
however, this person cannot be
apprehended. And this has been
said by our sister Vajira when
she was face to face with the
Lord Buddha:
"Where all constituent parts
are present, the word "a
chariot" is applied. So,
likewise, where the skandhas are,
the term a "being"
commonly is used."
"It is wonderful, Nagasena,
it is astonishing, Nagasena! Most
brilliantly have these questions
been answered! Were the Lord
Buddha Himself here, He would
approve what you have said. Well
spoken, Nagasena! Well
spoken!"
Personal
Identity and Rebirth
The king asked: "When
someone is reborn, Venerable
Nagasena, is he the same as the
one who just died, or is he
another?"
The elder replied: "He is
neither the same nor
another."
"Give me an
illustration!"
"What do you think, Great
King? When you were a tiny
infant, newly born and quite
soft, were you then the same as
the one who is now grown
up?"
"No, that infant was one, I,
now grown up, am another."
"If that is so, then, Great
King, you have had no mother, no
father, no reaching, no
schooling! Do we then take it
that there is one mother for the
embryo in the first stage,
another for the second stage,
another for the third, another
for the fourth, another for the
baby, another for the grown-up
man? Is the school-boy one
person, and the one who has
finished school another? Does one
commit a crime, but the hands and
feet of another are cut
off?"
"Certainly not! But what
would you say, Reverend Sir, to
all that?"
The elder replied: "I was
neither the tiny infant, newly
born and quite soft, nor am I now
the grown-up man; but all these
are comprised in one unit
depending on this very
body."
"Give me a simile!"
"If a man were to light a
lamp, could it give light
throughout the whole night?"
"Yes, it could."
"Is now the flame which
burns in the first watch of the
night the same as the one which
burns in the second?"
"It is not the same."
"Or is the flame which burns
in the second watch the same as
the one which burns in the last
one?"
"It is not the same."
"Do we then take it that
there is one lamp in the first
watch of the night, another in
the second, and another again in
the third?"
"No, it is just because of
the light of the lamp shines
throughout the night."
"Even so must we understand
the collocation of a series of
successive dharmas. At rebirth
one dharma arises, while another
stops; but the two processes take
place almost simultaneously (i.e.
they are continous). Therefore,
the first act of consciousness in
the new existence is neither the
same as the last act of
consciousness in the previous
existence, nor it is the
another."
"Give me another
simile!"
"Milk, once the milking is
done, turns after sometimes into
curds; from curds it turns into
fresh butter; and from fresh
butter into ghee. Would it now be
correct to say that the milk is
the same thing as the curds, or
the fresh butter, or the
ghee?"
"No, it would not. But they
have been produced because of
it."
"Just so must be understood
the collocation of a series of
successive dharmas."
Personal
Idenitity and Karma
The king asked: "Is there,
Venerable Nagasena, any being
which passes on from this body to
another body?"
"No, Your Majesty!"
"If there were no passing on
from this body to another, would
not one then in one's next life
be freed from the evil deeds
committed in the past?"
"Yes, that would be so if
one were not linked once again
with a new organism. But since,
Your Majesty, one is linked once
again with a new organism,
therefore one is not freed from
one's evil deeds."
"Give me a simile!"
"If a man should steal
another man's mangoes, would he
deserve a thrashing for
that?"
"Yes, of course!"
"But he would not have
stolen the very same mangoes as
the other one had planted. Why
should he deserve a
thrashing?"
"For the reason that the
stolen mangoes had grown because
of those that were planted."
"Just so, Your Majesty, it
is because of the deeds one does,
whether pure or impure, by means
of this psycho-physical organism,
that one is once again linked
with another psycho-physical
organism, and is not freed from
one's evil deeds."
"Very good, Venerable
Nagasena!"
The king said: "Is it
through wise attention that
people become exempt from further
rebirth?"
"Yes, that is due to wise
attention, and also to wisdom,
and the other wholesome
dharmas."
"But is not wise attention
the same as wisdom?"
"No, Your Majesty! Attention
is one thing, and wisdom another.
Sheep and goats, oxen and
buffaloes, camels and asses have
attention, but wisdom they have
not."
"Well put, Venerable
Nagasena!"
The king asked: "What is the
mark of attention, and what is
the mark of wisdom?"
"Consideration is the mark
of attention, cutting off that of
wisdom."
"How is that? Give me a
simile!"
"You know barley-reapers, I
suppose?"
"Yes, I do."
"How then do they reap the
barley?"
"With the left hand they
seize a bunch of barley, in the
right hand they hold a sickle,
and they cut off the barley with
that sickle."
"Just so, Your Majesty, the
yogin seizes his mental processes
with his attention, and by his
wisdom he cuts off the
defilements."
"Well put, Venerable
Nagasena!"
The king said: "When you
just spoke of the other wholesome
dharmas, which one did you
mean?"
"I meant morality, faith,
vigour, mindfulness, and
concentration."
"And what is the mark of
morality?"
"Morality has the mark of
providing a basis for all
wholesome dharmas, whatever they
may be. When based on morality,
all the wholesome dharmas will
not dwindle away."
"Give me an
illustration!"
"As all plants and animals
which increase, grow, and
prosper, do so with the earth as
their basis, just so the yogin,
with morality as his support,
with morality as basis, develops
the five cardinal virtues, i.e.
faith, vigour, mindfulness,
concentration, and wisdom."
"Give me an
illustration!"
"As the builder of a city
when constructing a town, first
of all clears the site, removes
all stumps and thorns, and levels
it; and only after that he lays
out and marks off the roads and
cross-roads, and so builds the
city. Even so the yogin develops
the five cardinal virtues with
morality as his support, with
morality as his basis."
The king said: "What is the
mark of faith?"
"Faith makes serene, and it
leaps forward."
"And how does faith make
serene?"
"When faith arises it
arrests the [Five] Hindrances,
and the heart becomes free from
them, clear, serene and
undisturbed."
"Give me an
illustration!"
"A universal monarch might
on his way, together with his
fourfold army, cross over a small
stream. Stirred up by the
elephants and horses, by the
chariots and infantry, the water
would become disturbed, agitated
and muddy. Have crossed over, the
universal monarch would order his
men to bring some water to drink.
But the king would possesses a
miraculous water-cleaning gem,
and his men, in obedience to his
command, would throw it into the
stream. Then at once all
fragments of vegetation would
float away, the mud would settle
at the bottom, the stream would
become clear, serene and
undisturbed, and fit to be drunk
by the universal monarch. Here
the stream corresponds to the
heart, the monarch's men to the
yogin, the fragments of
vegetation and the mud to the
defilements, and the miraculous
water-clearing gem to
faith."
"And how does faith leap
forward?"
"When the yogin sees that
the hearts of other have been set
free, he leaps forward, by way of
aspiration, to the various fruits
of a holy life, and he makes
efforts to attain the yet
unattained, to find the yet
unfound, to realize the yet
unrealized."
"Give me an
illustrated!"
"Suppose that a great cloud
were to burst over a hill-slope.
The water then would flow down
the slope, would first fill all
the hill's clefts, fissures, and
gullies, and would then run into
the river below, making its bank
overflow on both sides. Now
suppose further a great crowd of
people had come along, and unable
to size up either the width or
the depth of the river, should
stand frightened and hesitating
on the bank. But then the some
man would come along, who,
conscious of his own strength and
power, would firmly tie on his
loin-cloth and jump across the
river. And the great crowd of
people, seeing him on the other
side, would cross likewise. Even
so the yogin, when he has seen
that the hearts of others have
been set free, leaps forward, by
aspiration, to the various fruits
of the holy life, and he makes
efforts to attain the yet
unattained, to find the yet
unfound, to realise the yet
unrealized. And this is what the
Lord Buddha has said in the
Samyutta Nikaya:
"By faith the flood is
crossed,
By wakefulness the sea;
By vigour ill is passed;
By wisdom cleansed is he."
The king asked: "And what is
the mark of vigour?"
"Vigour props up, and when
propped up by vigour, all the
wholesome dharmas do not dwindle
away."
"Give me a simile!"
"If a man's house were
falling down, he would prop it up
with a new place of wood, and so
supported, that house would not
collaspe."
The king asked: "And what is
the mark of mindfulness?"
"When mindfulness arises,
one calls to mind the dharmas
which participate in what is
wholesome and unwholesome,
blameable and blameless, inferior
and sublime, dark and light, i.e.
these are the four applications
of mindfulness, there are the
four applications of mindfulness,
these are the four right efforts,
these are the four roads to
psychic power, these are the five
cardinal virtues, these are the
five powers, these are the seven
limbs of enlightenment, this is
the holy eightfold path, this is
calm, this is insight, this is
knowledge and this is
emancipation. Thereafter, the
yogin tends those dharmas which
should be tended, and he does not
tend those which should not be
tended; he partakes of those
dharmas which should be followed,
and he does not partake of those
which should not be followed. It
is in this sense that calling to
mind is a mark of
mindfulness."
"Give me a simile!"
"It is like the treasurer of
a universal monarch, who each
morning and evening reminds his
royal master of his magnificent
assets: So many elephants you
have, so many horses, so many
chariots, so much infantry, so
many gold coins, so much bullion,
so much property; may your
majesty bear in this mind! In
this way he calls to mind his
master's wealth."
"And how does mindfulness
take up?"
"When mindfulness arises,
the outcome of beneficial and
harmful dharmas is examined in
this way: These dharmas are
beneficial, these harmful, these
dharmas are helpful, these
unhelpful. Thereafter, the yogin
removes the harmful dharmas, and
takes up the beneficial ones; he
removes the unhelpful dharmas,
and takes up the helpful ones. It
is in this sense that mindfulness
takes up."
"Give me a comparison!"
"It is like the invaluable
adviser of a universal monarch
who knows what is beneficial and
what harmful to his royal master,
what is helpful and what is
unhelpful. Thereafter what is
harmful and unhelpful can be
removed, what is beneficial and
helpful can be taken up."
The king asked: "And what is
the mark of concentration?"
"It stands at the head.
Whatever wholesome dharmas there
may be, they all are headed by
concentration, they bend towards
concentration, lead to
concentration, incline to
concentration."
"Give me a comparison!"
"It is as with a building
with a pointed roof: Whatever
rafters they are, they all
converge on the top, and bend
towards the top, meet at the top,
and the top occupies the most
prominent place. So with
concentration on relation to the
other wholesome dharmas."
"Give me a further
comparison!"
"If a king were to enter a
battle with his fourfold army.
then all his troops: The
elephants, cavalry, chariots, and
infantry, would be handed by him,
and would be ranged around him.
Such is the position of
concentration in relation to the
other wholesome dharmas."
The king then asked: "Then,
what is the mark of wisdom?"
"Cutting off is, as I said
before, one mark of wisdom. In
addition, it illuminates."
"And how does wisdom
illuminate?"
"When wisdom arises, it
dispels the darkness of
ignorance, generates the
illumination of knowledge, sheds
the light of cognition, and makes
the holy truths stand out
clearly. Thereafter the yogin,
with his correct wisdom, can see
impermanence, ill, and not
self."
"Give me a comparison!"
"It is like a lamp which a
man would take into a dark house.
It would dispel the darkness,
would illuminate, shed light, and
make the forms in the house stand
out clearly."
"Well put, Nagasena!"
Problems of
Nirvana
The king asked: "Is
cessation Nirvana?"
"Yes, your majesty!"
"How is that,
Nagasena?"
"All the foolish common
people take delight in the senses
and their objects, are impressed
by them, are attached to them. In
that way, they are carried away
by the flood and are not set free
from birth, old age and death,
from grief, lamentation, pain,
sadness, and despair - they are,
I say, not set free from
suffering. But the well-informed
holy disciples do not take
delight in the senses and their
objects, are not impressed by
them, are not attached to them,
and in consequence their craving
ceases; the cessation of craving
leads successively to that of
grasping, of becoming, of birth,
of old age and death, of grief,
lamentation, pain, sadness, and
despair - that is to say, to the
cessation of all this mass of
ill. It is thus that cessation is
Nirvana."
"Very good, Nagasena!"
The king asked: "Do all win
Nirvana?"
"No, they do not. Only those
win Nirvana who, progressing
correctly, know by their super
knowledge those dharmas which
should be known by super
knowledge, comprehend those
dharmas which should be
comprehended, forsake those
dharmas which should be forsaken,
develop those dharmas which
should be developed, and realize
those dharmas which should be
realized."
"Very good, Nagasena!"
The king asked: "Do those
who have not won Nirvana know how
happy a state it is?"
"Yes, they do."
"But how can one know this
about Nirvana without having
attained it?"
"Now, what do you think,
your majesty? Do those who have
not had their hands and feet cut
off know how hard it is to have
them cut off?"
"Yes, they do."
"And how do they know
it?"
"From hearing the sound of
the lamentations of those whose
hands and feet have been cut
off."
"So it is by hearing the
words of those who have seen
Nirvana that one knows it to be
comforted."
"Well said, Nagasena!"
The Nature
of Nirvana
King Milinda said: "I will
grant you, Nagasena, that Nirvana
is absolute ease, and that
nevertheless one cannot point to
its form or shape, its duration
or size, either by simile or
explanation, by reason or by
argument. But is there perhaps
some quality of Nirvana which it
shares with other things, and
which lends itself to a
metaphorical explanation?"
"Its form, O King, cannot be
elucidated by similes, but its
qualities can."
"How good to hear that,
Nagasena! Speak then, quickly, so
that I may have an explanation of
even one of the aspects of
Nirvana! Appease the fever of my
heart! Allay it with the cool
sweet breezes of your
words!"
"Nirvana shares one quality
with the lotus, two with water,
three with medicine, ten with
space, three with the wishing
jewel, and five with a mountain
peak. As the lotus is unstained
by water, so is Nirvana unstained
by all the defilements. As cool
water allays feverish heat, so
also Nirvana is cool and allays
the fever of all the passions.
Moreover, as water removes the
thirst of men and beasts who are
exhausted, parched, and thirsty,
and overpowered by heat, so also
Nirvana removes the craving for
sensuous enjoyments, the craving
for further becoming, the craving
for the cessation of becoming. As
medicine protects from the
torments of poisons, so Nirvana
protects from the torments of the
poisonous passions. Moreover, as
medicine puts an end to sickness,
so Nirvana puts an end to all
sufferings. Finally, Nirvana and
medicine both give security. And
these are the ten qualities which
Nirvana shares with space.
Neither is born, grows old, dies,
passes away, or is reborn; both
are unconquerable, cannot be
stolen, are unsupported, are
roads respectively for birds and
Arhats to journey on, are
unobstructed and infinite. Like
the wishing jewel, Nirvana grants
all one can desire, brings joy,
and sheds light. As a mountain
peak is lofty and exalted, so is
Nirvana. As a mountain peak is
unshakeable, so is Nirvana. As a
mountain is inaccessible, so is
Nirvana inaccessible to all the
passions. As no seeds can grow on
a mountain peak, so the seeds of
all the passions cannot grow in
Nirvana. And finally, as a
mountain peak is free from all
desire to please or displease, so
is Nirvana!"
"Well said, Nagasena! So it
is, and as much I accept
it."
The
Realization of Nirvana
King Milinda said: "In the
world one can see things produced
of karma, things produced from a
cause, things produced by nature.
Tell me, what in the world is not
born of karma, or a cause, or of
nature?"
"There are two such things,
space and Nirvana."
"Do not, Nagasena, corrupt
the Jina (Buddha)'s words, do not
answer the question
ignorantly!"
"What did I say, Your
Majesty, that you speak thus to
me?"
"What you said about space
not being born of karma, or from
a cause, or from nature, that was
correct. But with many hundreds
of arguments has the Lord Buddha
proclaimed to His disciples the
way to the realization of
Nirvana, and then you say that
Nirvana is not born of a
cause!"
"It is true that the Lord
has with many hundreds of
arguments proclaimed to His
disciples the way to the
realization of Nirvana, but that
does not mean that He has spoken
of a cause for the production of
Nirvana."
"Here, Nagasena, we do
indeed enter from darkness into
greater darkness, from a jungle
into a deeper jungle, from a
thicket into a denser thicket, in
as much as we are given a cause
for the realization of Nirvana,
but no cause for the production
of that same dharma (Nirvana). If
there is a cause for the
realization of Nirvana, we would
also expect one for its
production. If there is a son's
father, one would for that reason
also expect the father to have
had a father; if there is a
pupil's teacher, one would for
that reason also expect the
teacher to have had a teacher; if
there is a seed for a sprout, one
would for that reason also expect
the seed to have had a seed. Just
so, if there is cause for the
realization of Nirvana, one would
for that reason it must have also
expect a cause for its
production. If a tree or creeper
has a top, then for that reason
it must also have a middle and a
root. Just so, if there is a
cause for the realization of
Nirvana, one would for that
reason also expect a cause for
its production."
"Nirvana, O King, is not
something that should be
produced. That is why no cause
for its production has been
proclaimed."
"Please, Nagasena, give me a
reason, convince me by an
argument, so that I can
understand this point!"
"Well then, O King, attend
carefully, listen closely and I
will tell you the reason for
this. Could a man with his
natural strength go up from here
to the Himalaya mountains?"
"Yes, he could."
"But could that man with his
natural strength bring the
Himalaya mountains here?"
"No, he could not."
"Just so, it is possible to
point out the way to the
realization of Nirvana, but
impossible to show a cause for
its production. Could a man, who
with his natural strength has
crossed in a boat over the great
ocean, get to the farther
shore?"
"Yes, he could."
"But could that man with his
natural strength bring the
farther shore of the great ocean
shore here?"
"No, he could not."
"Just so, one can point out
the way to the realization of
Nirvana, but one cannot show a
cause for its production. And
what is the reason for that?
Because that dharma (Nirvana) is
unconditioned."
"Then, Nagasena, is Nirvana
unconditioned?"
"So it is, O King,
unconditioned is Nirvana, not
made by anything. Of Nirvana one
cannot say that it is produced,
or unproduced, or that it should
be produced; that it is past, or
present, or future; or that one
can become aware of it by the
eye, or the ear, or the nose, or
the tongue, or the body."
"In that case, Nagasena, you
indicate Nirvana as a dharma
which is not, and Nirvana does
not exist."
"Nirvana is something which
is recognizable by the mind. A
holy disciple, who has followed
the right road, sees Nirvana with
a mind which is pure, sublime,
straight, unimpeded and
disinterested."
"But what then is that
Nirvana like? Give me a simile,
and convince me by arguments. For
a dharma which exists can surely
be illustrated by a simile!"
"Is there, Great King,
something called wind?"
"Yes, there is such a
thing."
"Please, will Your Majesty
show me the wind, its colour and
shape, and whether it is thin or
thick, long or short?"
"One cannot point to the
wind like that for the wind does
not lend itself to being grasped
with the hands, or to being
untouched. But nevertheless there
is such a thing called
'wind'."
"If one cannot point to the
wind, one might concluded that
there is no wind at all."
"But I know, Nagasena, that
there is wind, I am quite
convincted of it, in spite of the
fact that I cannot point it
out."
"Just so, Your Majesty,
there is Nirvana, but one cannot
point to Nirvana, either by its
colour or its shape."
"Very good, Nagasena. Clear
is the simile, convincing is the
argument. So it is, and so I
accept it: There is a
Nirvana."
The Arhats and
their Bodies
The king asked: "Does
someone who is no more reborn
feel any unpleasant
feelings?"
The elder replied: "Some he
feels, and others not."
"Which one does he feel, and
which one not?"
"He feels physical, but not
any mental pain."
"How is that?"
"The causes and conditions
which produce feelings of
physical pain have not ceased to
operate, whereas those which
produce feelings of mental pain
have. And so it has been said by
the Lord Buddha: Only one kind of
feelings he feels, physical, and
not mental."
"And when he feels a
physical pain, why does he not
escape into Final Nirvana, by
dying quickly?"
"An Arhat has no more likes
or dislikes. Arhats do not shake
down the unripe fruit, the wise
wait for it to mature. And so it
has been said by the elder
Sariputra, the Dharma's General:
"It is not death, it is not
life I cherish.
I bide my time, as a servant
waiting for his wage.
It is not death, it is not life I
cherish.
I bide my time, in mindfulness
and wisdom steeped."
"Well put, Nagasena!"
The king asked: "Is the body
dear to you recluses?"
"No, it is not."
"But then, why do you look
after it, and cherish it
so?"
"Has Your Majesty somewhere
and at some time in the course of
a battle been wounded by an
arrow?"
"Yes, that has
happened."
"In such cases, is not the
wound anointed with salve,
smeared with oil, and bandaged
with fine linen?"
"Yes, so it is."
"Then, is this treatment a
sign that the wound is dear to
Your Majesty?"
"No, it is not dear to me,
but all this is done to it so
that the flesh may grow
again."
"Just so the body is not
dear to the recluses. Without
being attached to the body they
take care of it for the purpose
of making a holy life possible.
The Lord Buddha has compared the
body to a wound, and so the
recluses take care for the body
as for a wound, without being
attached to it. For the Lord
Buddha said:
"A damp skin hides it,
But it is a wound,
Large with nine openings.
All around it ozzes impure
And evil smelling matter."
"Well answered,
Nagasena!"
The king asked: "What is the
difference between someone with
greed and someone without
greed?"
"The one is attached, the
other unattached."
"What does that mean?"
"The one covets, the other
does not."
"As I see it, the greedy
person and the one who is free
from greed both wish for
agreeable food, and neither of
them wishes for bad food."
"But the one who is not free
from greed eats his food while
experiencing both its taste and
some greed for tastes; the one
who is free from greed eats his
food while experiencing its
taste, but without having any
greed for it."
"Very good, Nagasena!"
The king asked: "For what
reason does the common worlding
suffer both physical and mental
pain?"
"Because his thought is so
undeveloped. He is like a hungry
and excited ox, who has been tied
up with a weak, fragile and short
piece of straw or creeper, and
who, when agitated, rushes off,
taking his tender with him. So,
someone whose thought is
undeveloped, gets agitated in his
mind when a pain arises in him,
and his agitated mind bends and
contorts his body, and makes it
writhe. Undeveloped in his mind,
he trembles, shrieks, and cries
with terror. This is reason why
the common worlding suffers both
physical and mental pain."
"And what is the reason why
Arhats feel only one kind of
feelings, physical and not
mental?"
"The thought of the Arhats
is developed, well developed, it
is tamed, well tamed, it is
obedient and disciplined. When
invaded by a painful feeling, the
Arhat firmly grasps at the idea
of its impermanence, and ties his
thought to the post of
contemplation. And his thought,
tied to the post of
contemplation, does not tremble
or shake, remains steadfast and
undisturbed. But the disturbing
influence of the pain,
nevertheless, makes his body
bend, contorts it, makes it
writhe."
"That Nagasena, is indeed a
most wonderful thing in this
world, that someone's mind should
remain unshaken when his body is
shaken. Tell me the reason for
that!"
"Suppose, Your Majesty, that
there is a gigantic tree, with
trunk, branches, and leaves. If
it were hit by the force of the
wind, its branches would shake,
but would the trunk also
shake?"
"No, Venerable Sir!"
"Just so the thought of the
Arhat does not tremble or shake,
like the trunk of the gigantic
tree."
"Wonderful, Nagasena, most
admireable, Nagasena!"
Conclusion
The king, as a result of his
discussions with the Venerable
Nagasena, was overjoyed and
humbled. He saw the value in the
Buddha's religion, gained
confidence in the Triple Gem,
lost his spikiness and obstinacy,
gained faith in the qualities of
the elder, in his observation of
the monastic rules, his spiritual
progress and his general
demeanour; became trusting and
resigned, free from conceit and
arrogance. Like a cobra whose
fangs have been drawn, he said:
"Well said, well said,
Nagasena! You have answered my
questions, which would have given
scope to a Buddha, you have
answered them well! Apart from
the elder Sariputra, the supreme
General of the Dharma, there is
no one in this religion of Buddha
who can deal with questions as
well as you do. Forgive my
transgressions, Nagasena! May the
Venerable Nagasena accept me as a
lay-follower, as one who takes
his refuge the Triple Gem from
today onwards, as long as I shall
live!"
Back to main page @ PostOne.com/home/puntsog