Written by Ng E-Ching, 2A01B, 21 April 1996.
"... the natural man functions like the virtuous shepherd of normal pastoral, to indicate corruption and degeneracy in the civilized world; if the natural man is a brute, so much more terrible is the sin of the nobleman who abases below the natural." Consider the debate between Art and Nature in the play The Tempest.
The Tempest
is one of Shakespeare's late comedies, in which
the typical comic conventions are blended with darker elements
of tragedy. One of the ways this manifests itself
is in the imperfect
conclusion of the play. Although comic traditions such as marriage
and the restoration of order are followed, not every character
is disposed of
[ominous?]
perfectly.
The character that this is most evident with is Antonio. Although
Prospero forgives him for his removal of Prospero from Milan,
and does not reveal his plot to kill Alonso, we receive
no evidence
that Antonio repents of his actions. At the banquet scene which
causes Alonso to repent, indeed, drives him temporarily to insanity,
Antonio's conscience is apparently unaffected. His only line after
the harpy's appearance -- "I'll be thy second" -- implies that
he [possible]
will follow Alonso and aid him in suicide. At the concluding
scene of the play, Antonio says almost nothing, even when Prospero
promises not to give him and Sebastian away to Alonso.
This seems
to indicate that he does not share in the general mood of repentance
and reconciliation, especially as his sole line is a sarcastic
remark about Caliban, so reminiscent of his earlier bantering
with Sebastian that it seems a statement that he has
not changed.
It seems that Antonio is not a character who can be brought to
repentance, but it must be questioned whether this is due to innate
imperfection of his nature -- which should be noble, having been
inherited from
a "good womb" -- or whether it is
by choice that he embraces evil.
When considering Antonio, Sebastian cannot be forgotten. He is
a foil for Antonio, being also a younger
son[?], and in danger of
being led by Antonio into committing the same crimes. It is difficult
to ascertain whether Sebastian has really changed. While he, like
Antonio, is restored to the natural order at the end of the play,
by being locked out of the
leadership position
which he is clearly
unfit for, he banters in Act V as if nothing had changed.
His
fear during the harpy scene is genuine, and after it, "But one
fiend at a time / I'll fight their legions o'er" indicates that
his mind, too, is slightly unhinged. However, this fear and his
alarm at Prospero's supernatural knowledge of his plot to kill
Alonso seem to have no lasting effect
on him -- he jokes about
Caliban and Stephano as blithely as ever, speaking far too often
and cheerfully to be consistent with guilt. In Sebastian's case,
future harmony may be at risk, Sebastian is easily led into crime
by people such as Antonio. By his inclusion, Shakespeare
makes
it clear that some characters are limited by their natures in
what goodness they can achieve.
Stephano and Trinculo are also practically unchanged by the end
of the play. From getting drunk and boisterous at their entrance,
they remain irreverent and get even drunker by the conclusion.
Stephano's shamefaced response to Prospero's challenge "You'ld
be King o' the isle, sirrah?" -- "I should have been a sore one,
then" -- seems to imply that he has learned that
this particular
deed was wrong, but does not guarantee future good behaviour.
Stephano and Trinculo must be watched, because even more so than
Sebastian, neither, by nature, is able to fully repent and make
a permanent change in their characters, and Stephano especially
can
be
effortlessly led into wrongdoing. It can only be hoped
that fear of cramps will restrain him.
While these characters do not support fully the idea of harmony
and reconciliation at the end of the play, because they do not
fully repent, there are other characters who do repent to varying
degrees. The character who fully repents and makes complete restitution
is Alonso,
who
not only restores Prospero's dukedom, but gives
him his son in marriage. Alonso
represents
the person who is able to fully enter into the spirit
of reconciliation.
Caliban is a character who, while having a considerably imperfect
nature, manages to learn a great deal by the end of the play.
His words "I'll be wise hereafter,/ And seek for grace" are a
promise for the future, indicating that he has accepted his limitations,
and has chosen to follow the guidance of superior natures. We
are confident that Caliban will be able to improve himself,
[He will try] because
he has now realised, through Prospero's allowing him to learn
on
his own,
that Prospero, not Stephano, is the one he should
turn to for guidance. Caliban is an
unusual figure in
that while we are fully aware of his limited capacity for learning,
he does present hope for the future.
[exactly how?]
Even in the characters who have not actually committed any wrong
during the course of the play, we are made
aware of imperfections.
Ferdinand, who by and large has presented himself as a blameless
heir, is discovered playing chess with Miranda and cheating. From
Miranda's words "for a score of kingdoms you should wrangle,/
And I would call it fair play", we gain the impression that
Ferdinand was
cheating
on his own behalf. This is worrying, because it seems
that Ferdinand may not always follow the dictates of his conscience
as a king. We are offered some reassurance in Miranda -- she comments
on his cheating, and we have
come to trust her
sense of right in watching her remonstrate with Prospero,
when watching the storm and when he imprisons Ferdinand.
She is the check that will balance off Ferdinand's limitations
of nature. (Although I personally find it slightly unsettling
that all three times, Miranda's entreaties/comments are not
seen to have any effect.)
[good]
However, we are left in doubt as to whether Miranda forgives and
accepts Caliban for what he is. This is the only instance of
forgiveness that seems lacking in the end of the play.
[good]
Although Prospero is the character who masterminds the whole comic
resolution of The Tempest, some of his actions cause us
uneasiness for the future. Generally, he reassures us with actions
such as his forgiveness of the court party and keeping his promise
to Ariel. It is in keeping with the spirit of reconciliation that
he forgives Sebastian and Antonio for their plot to kill Alonso
-- but one feels that Alonso should be told about it and given
the opportunity to
forgive
them too. It seems possible that Prospero
is trusting too much of the future to himself, by not warning
Alonso that Sebastian might cause problems. Just an hour or so
before, he gave in to the desire to display his art to Ferdinand
and Miranda, meanwhile forgetting the
court party and Caliban's
plot. Prospero is not
infallible. His
vanity
is also painfully
obvious in his desire to tell everyone "the story of (his) life"
at the close of the play. However, Prospero has not failed us
-- he has forgiven all and created the opportunity for this happy
ending. His overly angry response to Ariel's reminding him of
his promise has become an easy assent by the end of the play;
apparently cruel and arbitrary actions such as the storm and Ferdinand's
imprisonment
have been revealed as having purpose, and causing
lasting harm to no one. Although not perfect, it seems likely
that Prospero will succeed in the task ahead of him, as he succeeded
in the tasks he set himself during the play.
Shakespeare was certainly aware of the imperfections of human
nature when he wrote the conclusion of The Tempest. However,
these do not preclude the spirit of reconciliation and harmony
that characterise a comic resolution. Antonio, Sebastian, Stephano,
Trinculo and Caliban may indeed pose threats in the future, as
they have done during the play, but these will only cause serious
threat
if
they are not watched over. From the beginning of the
play, it is made clear that Prospero will not
relinquish trust
as freely as he did in Milan. Because Prospero now knows these
characters' limitations, we are fairly confident that he will
watch
over them,
and that the ending of the play is truly a comic resolution.
Tight, succinct, accurate, insightful. Bingo!
Use quotation more to your benefit. 39/50
Art vs. Nature (E-Ching's),
Art vs. Nature (Rouh Phin's),
Prospero as Ruler,
Prospero vs. Caliban,
The Tempest as Masque,
Apparitions and Stage Spectacle,
Ideas vs. Dramatic Principle,
Island of Echoes & Suggestions,
Comic Resolution,
Prospero Context
Back to Chao Mugger front door
http://www.singnet.com.sg/~yisheng/notes/index.htm